dcsimg
Image of Mango tilapia
Life » » Animals » » Vertebrates » » Ray Finned Fishes » » Cichlidae »

Mango Tilapia

Sarotherodon galilaeus (Linnaeus 1758)

Diagnostic Description

provided by Fishbase
Diagnosis: 21-25 rakers on lower limb of first arch; length of lower pharyngeal jaw < 43.5% of head length; 29-32 scales in lateral line series; head length 32.5-39% of standard length; toothed area of lower pharyngeal jaw broad > 2-3 times in keel length (Ref. 81260).Description: head length 32.5-35.5% SL; lower pharyngeal jaw with unicuspid anterior teeth and straight posterior teeth; ventral keel elongate, longer than dentigerous plate; 1-4 rows of teeth in oral jaws, outer row teeth bicuspid (Ref. 81260).Coloration: bluish grey, blue-purple dorsally, grey-white ventrally; 4-6 faint, narrow, vertical bars on flank and caudal peduncle; bars on flank thin and often extending well below level of mid-body; upper lip same color as upper part of snout, lower lip pale or whitish, same color as throat and chest; dorsal fin bluish grey, 2 rows of round clear maculae in interspinous membrane, maculae becoming more numerous in soft dorsal; "tilapia spot" only faintly evident, or absent; caudal fin dark bluish grey with clear maculae medially; anal fin dark bluish grey, more clear in upper part where there are sometimes clear maculae (Ref. 81260).
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
FishBase
Recorder
Crispina B. Binohlan
original
visit source
partner site
Fishbase

Diseases and Parasites

provided by Fishbase
Amplicaecum Infection (Larvae). Parasitic infestations (protozoa, worms, etc.)
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
FishBase
Recorder
Allan Palacio
original
visit source
partner site
Fishbase

Diseases and Parasites

provided by Fishbase
Pentastoma Infection (Larvae). Parasitic infestations (protozoa, worms, etc.)
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
FishBase
Recorder
Allan Palacio
original
visit source
partner site
Fishbase

Diseases and Parasites

provided by Fishbase
Whirling Viral Disease of Tilapia Larvae. Viral diseases
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
FishBase
Recorder
Allan Palacio
original
visit source
partner site
Fishbase

Diseases and Parasites

provided by Fishbase
Isopoda infestation with Nerocila. Parasitic infestations (protozoa, worms, etc.)
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
FishBase
Recorder
Allan Palacio
original
visit source
partner site
Fishbase

Life Cycle

provided by Fishbase
The initiative throughout courting and mating is taken predominantly by the female; female mainly responsible for the excavation of nest and defending mating territory. Pair-formation exists and is dissolved as soon as the eggs are in the parental mouth. Mouth brooding is reportedly biparental.
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
FishBase
Recorder
Crispina B. Binohlan
original
visit source
partner site
Fishbase

Migration

provided by Fishbase
Potamodromous. Migrating within streams, migratory in rivers, e.g. Saliminus, Moxostoma, Labeo. Migrations should be cyclical and predictable and cover more than 100 km.
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
FishBase
Recorder
Susan M. Luna
original
visit source
partner site
Fishbase

Morphology

provided by Fishbase
Dorsal spines (total): 15 - 17; Dorsal soft rays (total): 12 - 13; Analspines: 3; Analsoft rays: 9 - 11; Vertebrae: 28 - 30
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
FishBase
Recorder
Crispina B. Binohlan
original
visit source
partner site
Fishbase

Trophic Strategy

provided by Fishbase
Is an obligate particulate feeder during the larval and juvenile stage, and is mainly an obligate filter feeder when adult. A transition period exists during which both feeding modes can be used according to environmental conditions (Ref. 46977, 47339).
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
FishBase
Recorder
Crispina B. Binohlan
original
visit source
partner site
Fishbase

Biology

provided by Fishbase
Has been known to occur at 9°C; occasionally form schools; territorial (Ref. 2). Adults prefer open waters but juveniles and breeding adults are found inshore (Ref. 4999). Often associated with beds of submerged vegetation in Sudd lakes; feed on algae and fine organic debris; bi-parental mouthbrooder (Ref. 28714). Lacks marked sexual dichromatism when sexually active; forms temporary pair bonds (Ref. 81260). Maximum size recorded at 41.0 cm TL (Ref. 2756).
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
FishBase
Recorder
Susan M. Luna
original
visit source
partner site
Fishbase

Importance

provided by Fishbase
fisheries: commercial; aquaculture: commercial; aquarium: commercial
license
cc-by-nc
copyright
FishBase
Recorder
Susan M. Luna
original
visit source
partner site
Fishbase

Mango tilapia

provided by wikipedia EN

The mango tilapia (Sarotherodon galilaeus) is a species of fish from the cichlid family that is native to fresh and brackish waters in Africa and the Levant.[2] Other common names include Galilaea tilapia, Galilean comb, Galilee St. Peter's fish, and St. Peter's fish.[3] (To differentiate from other Israeli species of "St. Peter's fish" see below.) This is a relatively large cichlid at up to 41 centimetres (16 in) in total length and about 1.6 kilograms (3.5 lb) in weight.[2] It is very important to local fisheries and the species is also aquacultured.[1]

In addition to the nominate subspecies, four subspecies were recognized in the past, but today the species is considered monotypic.[2]

It is a bi-parental mouthbrooder. The mating strategies can vary. Both uni-parent and bi-parent mouthbrooding is used, and monogamous or polygamous behaviour.[4]

Distribution and habitat

This widespread species is found in lakes, rivers and other fresh or brackish habitats in northern and central Africa (including Saharan oases), ranging as far south as the Guinea region, the Congo River Basin, Lake Albert and Lake Turkana. Outside Africa it is found in Syria, Jordan and Israel.[2] It is one of the very few cichlids that is found in Africa north of the Sahara and in Asia. The typical temperature range is 22–28 °C (72–82 °F), but it has been recorded from waters as cold as 9 °C (48 °F).[2]

Behavior

Mating

Mating is usually monogamous for the mango tilapia. The male and female will create a depression in the substrate, in which the female will lay her eggs. Afterwards, the male will glide over the depression and fertilize the eggs. Mouth brooding is a tactic which, either male or female or both male and female, protects and carries the eggs in their mouth for a time period of about two weeks. However, pair bonding ends after mouth brooding begins.[5]

Male mate choice

An experiment studying mate choice in the mango tilapia shows results of the correlation between operational sex ratio, characteristics of the body and pairing. In this study, the fish were exposed to different OSR's (more males, more females, or an equal ratio). Pair bonding was formed quicker between larger fish, and there was a long delay in pairing for the most abundant sex in the OSR. In addition, this study showed that mango tilapia that mate within a similar size group have greater reproductive success.[4]

Male mating style flexibility and parental care

There is flexibility for male mango tilapia in their mating styles. During spawning, males can adapt the mating style of territoriality or non territoriality. Also, males can adapt other mating styles, like brooding participating or non participating in egg brooding and pairing or not pair bonding with the selected female. In addition to the multiple mating styles, the males show that they are able to select alternate reproductive styles (ARS), which are combinations of the mating styles that are mentioned above. Territoriality males were the most dominant group (which deserted the female after mating), but male reproductive behavior changes between different reproductive cycles. These mating styles are also important factors in parental care. There are many levels of parental care in mango tilapia: uniparental and biparental parental care (male, female or both parents can all exist in one population).[6][7]

For the mango tilapia, parental care is important for the survival of the offspring. Parents who shared the job of incubation had double the reproductive success of other parents who did the job alone. Rather, for uniparental parental care, the parent's reproductive success for each brood was 20% higher. In terms of the relationship between caring strategies and clutch size, either parent is equally capable of caring for its offspring (both capable of taking care of the same number of eggs and fry). Levels of parental care in mango tilapia depend on the costs and benefits of staying versus departing. Some costs of both males and females were the growth and prolonged time until the next time they reproduce. In addition, parental care decreased a female's future ability to reproduce (fecundity). This is plausible since a body weight increase increases fecundity. Female mango tilapia have high parental care costs, which can be thought to be separated in two parts: egg production cost and parental care cost. In experiments studying parents deserting their children, deserting was more frequent in males and females when there were higher parental care costs and males deserting was more frequent when there was a reduced benefits from parental care.[5][7][8]

Local names

Israel

The Israel Mango tilapia is known there also as "Galilee St. Peter's fish", in Arabic مشط أبيض musht 'abyad, which is white and larger than the "Common St. Peter's fish" (Tilapia zillii, مشط musht in Arabic and adopted into Modern Hebrew, lit. "comb").[9] Another "St. Peter's fish" is the "Jordan St. Peter's fish" (Oreochromis aureus), which was traditionally coming down the Jordan River from Lake Huleh to the Sea of Galilee and is black and also larger than the white "Common St. Peter's fish".[9]

References

  1. ^ a b Awaïss, A.; Azeroual, A.; Getahun, A.; et al. (2016) [errata version of 2010 assessment]. "Sarotherodon galilaeus ssp. galilaeus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2010: e.T183180A92476234. Retrieved 9 February 2019.
  2. ^ a b c d e Froese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.) (2014). "Sarotherodon galilaeus" in FishBase. July 2014 version.
  3. ^ Sarotherodon galilaeus galilaeus at Israquarium
  4. ^ a b Zeilstra, Ilja; Ros, Albert; Oliveira, Rui (2003). "Mate Choice in the Galilee St. Peter's Fish, Sarotherodon galilaeus". Behaviour. 140 (8–9): 1173–1188. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.908.915. doi:10.1163/156853903322589696. INIST:15368660.
  5. ^ a b Davies, Nicholas B.; Krebs, John R.; West, Stuart A. (2012). "Parental Care and Family Conflicts". An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 223–253. ISBN 978-1-4443-3949-9.
  6. ^ Fishelson, Lev; Hilzerman, Francesco (2002). "Flexibility in Reproductive Styles of Male St. Peter's Tilapia, Sarotherodon galilaeus (Cichlidae)". Environmental Biology of Fishes. 63 (2): 173–182. doi:10.1023/A:1014296103185. S2CID 23120157.
  7. ^ a b Balshine‐Earn, S. (February 1997). "The benefits of uniparental versus biparental mouth brooding in Galilee St. Peter's fish". Journal of Fish Biology. 50 (2): 371–381. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1997.tb01365.x.
  8. ^ Balshine-Earn, Sigal (July 1995). "The costs of parental care in Galilee St Peter's fish,Sarotherodon galilaeus". Animal Behaviour. 50 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1006/anbe.1995.0214. S2CID 32390374.
  9. ^ a b Geva-Kleinberger, Aharon (2009). Autochthonous Texts in the Arabic Dialect of the Jews of Tiberias. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. pp. 67, 107. ISBN 978-3-447-05934-3.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Sarotherodon galilaeus.
license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN

Mango tilapia: Brief Summary

provided by wikipedia EN

The mango tilapia (Sarotherodon galilaeus) is a species of fish from the cichlid family that is native to fresh and brackish waters in Africa and the Levant. Other common names include Galilaea tilapia, Galilean comb, Galilee St. Peter's fish, and St. Peter's fish. (To differentiate from other Israeli species of "St. Peter's fish" see .) This is a relatively large cichlid at up to 41 centimetres (16 in) in total length and about 1.6 kilograms (3.5 lb) in weight. It is very important to local fisheries and the species is also aquacultured.

In addition to the nominate subspecies, four subspecies were recognized in the past, but today the species is considered monotypic.

It is a bi-parental mouthbrooder. The mating strategies can vary. Both uni-parent and bi-parent mouthbrooding is used, and monogamous or polygamous behaviour.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN